Analysis on the energy efficiency, thermal performance and infection intervention characteristics of interactive cascade ventilation (ICV)

Floor radiation (FR) is one of the widely used heating modes in winter. However, the widespread and high outbreak of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has made the disadvantage of floor radiation that lacks fresh air and air movement exposed as a deficiency. To seek a heating mode that can realize a comfortable and healthy indoor environment with low cost, the interactive cascade ventilation (ICV) coupling with multiple low-grade sources was proposed in this study. Energy efficiency, thermal comfort and air quality were investigated by comparing with FR and floor radiation with mixing ventilation (FRMV). The results showed that by elevating the same indoor temperature, ICV can reduce indoor heat transfer by 28.41% and 30.94% than FR and FRMV, respectively. And ICV also presented the highest system COP by introducing multiple low-grade sources. In terms of thermal comfort, the indoor environment served by ICV was closer to thermal neutrality, and the subjective thermal comfort can also be enhanced by 10% and 8% relative to FR and FRMV. The CO2 test results indicated that by introducing the ICV, indoor air quality can be improved by 36.68% and 61.45% over FR and FRMV with the contaminant removal rate significantly accelerated. During the pandemic, ICV can reduce the COVID-19 infection rate by 9.6% and 55.5% within 8 h and 30 min compared with FRMV. The conclusions obtained in this paper can provide new ideas for designing air conditioning systems in the epidemic and the context of carbon reduction.

Investigation on the cross-infection control performance of interactive cascade ventilation in multi-scenario of winter

With the wide spread of COVID-19, numerous cases demonstrate that proper ventilation method can reduce the cross-infection risk obviously. Interactive cascade ventilation (ICV) as a recently proposed ventilation method, the advantage of indoor environment construction has been proven. However, few studies are conducted to investigate the virus prevention and control characteristics of ICV, which is particularly important under epidemic normalizing. Hence, this study explored and compared the cross-infection control performance of three ventilation strategies, namely mixing ventilation (MV), stratum ventilation (SV), and interactive cascade ventilation (ICV), with a validated CFD model. A typical office was selected as the background scene, where an infected person coughs, sneezes with standing or sitting at different positions. Exposure doses, health infection risk, and disease burden (DB) were employed as the evaluation indicators under different ventilation methods of multi-scenario. The research results indicated that the average aerosol exposure dose among the human respiratory region under ICV was 0.29 g/day, which was reduced by 67 % and 50 % compared with MV and SV. In addition, only in ICV can the health infection risk meets the EPA standard. The average disease health burden for exposed persons under ICV was 0.93 × 10−6 DALYs pppy, which was 37 % and 70 % lower than SV and MV. The findings obtained from this study confirm that ICV performs excellently in reducing the cross-infection risk, providing the theoretical basis for future epidemic prevention and control.

Disinfectant dodecyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride (DDBAC) disrupts gut microbiota, phospholipids, and calcium signaling in honeybees (Apis mellifera) at an environmentally relevant level.

One of the impacts of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a profound increase in the application amounts of disinfectants. Dodecyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride (DDBAC) is a widely used disinfectant, yet its hazards to non-target species remain largely unknown. We are unaware of any studies assessing DDBAC's impacts on honeybee, a pollinator species that is a useful indicator of environmental pollution essential for many forms of agricultural production. Here, we assessed the potentially negative effects of DDBAC on honeybees. After conducting a formal toxicity evaluation of DDBAC on honeybee mortality, we detected an accumulation of DDBAC in the honeybee midgut. We subsequently studied the midgut tissues of honeybees exposed to sub-lethal concentrations of DDBAC: histopathological examination revealed damage to midgut tissue upon DDBAC exposure, microbiome analysis showed a decreased abundance of beneficial midgut microbiota, lipidomics analysis revealed a significant reduction in cell membrane phospholipids with known functions in signal transduction, and a transcriptome analysis detected altered expression of genes involved in calcium signaling pathways (that variously function in calcium absorption, muscle contraction, and neurotransmission). Thus, our study establishes that DDBAC impacts honeybee midgut functions at multiple levels. Our study represents an early warning about the hazards of DDBAC and appeals for the proper stewardship of DDBAC to ensure the protection of our ecological environment.

Analysis on the thermal performance of low-temperature radiant floor coupled with intermittent stratum ventilation (LTR-ISV) for space heating.

With increasing energy use and outbreaks of respiratory infectious diseases (such as COVID-19) in buildings, there is a growing interest in creating healthy and energy-efficient indoor environments. A novel heating system named low-temperature radiant floor coupled with intermittent stratum ventilation (LTR-ISV) is proposed in this study. Thermal performance, indoor air quality, energy and exergy performance were investigated and compared with conventional radiant floor heating (CRFH) and conventional radiant floor heating with mixing ventilation (CRFH + MV). The results indicated that LTR-ISV had a more uniform operative temperature distribution and overall thermal sensation, and air mixing was enhanced without generating additional draft sensation. Compared with CRFH and CRFH + MV, the indoor CO2 concentration in LTR-ISV can be reduced by 1355 ppm and 400 ppm, respectively. Airborne transmission risk can also be reduced by 5.35 times. The coefficient of performance for CRFH, CRFH + MV, and LTR-ISV during working hours was 4.2, 2.5, and 3.4, respectively. The lower value of LTR-ISV was due to the high energy usage of the primary air handing unit. In the non-working hours, LTR-ISV was 0.6 and 1.3 higher compared to CRFH and CRFH + MV, respectively. The exergy efficiency of LTR-ISV, CRFH, and CRFH + MV was 81.77 %, 76.43 %, and 64.71 %, respectively. Therefore, the LTR-ISV system can meet the requirements of high indoor air quality and thermal comfort and provides a reference for the energy-saving use of low-grade energy in space heating.

A review of different ventilation modes on thermal comfort, air quality and virus spread control.

In the era of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), inappropriate indoor ventilation may turn out to be the culprit of microbial contamination in enclosed spaces and deteriorate the environment. To collaboratively improve the thermal comfort, air quality and virus spread control effect, it was essential to have an overall understanding of different ventilation modes. Hence, this study reviewed the latest scientific literature on indoor ventilation modes and manuals of various countries, identified characteristics of different ventilation modes and evaluated effects in different application occasions, wherefore to further propose their main limitations and solutions in the epidemic era. For thermal comfort, various non-uniform ventilation modes could decrease the floor-to-ceiling temperature difference, draft rate or PPD by 60%, 80% or 33% respectively, or increase the PMV by 45%. Unsteady ventilation modes (including intermittent ventilation and pulsating ventilation) could lower PPD values by 12%-37.8%. While for air quality and virus spread control, non-uniform ventilation modes could lower the mean age of air or contaminants concentration by 28.3%-47% or 15%-47% respectively, increase the air change efficiency, contaminant removal effectiveness or protection efficiency by 6.6%-10.4%, 22.6% or 14%-50% respectively. Unsteady ventilation mode (pulsating ventilation) could reduce the peak pollutant concentration and exposure time to undesirable concentrations by 31% and 48% respectively. Non-uniform modes and unsteady modes presented better performance in thermal comfort, air quality and virus spread control, whereas relevant performance evaluation indexes were still imperfect and the application scenarios were also limited.